Chicago was the biggest loser in net domestic migration

by Joe Zekas on 12/7/12

From newgeography.com:

For all the talk of how the Great Recession has driven people — particularly the “footloose young” — toward dense urban centers, Census data reveal that Americans are still drawn to the same sprawling Sun Belt regions as before.

An analysis of domestic migration for the nation’s 51 largest metropolitan statistical areas by demographer Wendell Cox shows that the 10 metropolises with the largest net gains from 2000 through 2009 are in the Sun Belt, led by Phoenix, and followed by Riverside-San Bernardino, Calif.; Atlanta; Dallas-Ft. Worth; and Las Vegas.

From July 2010 to July 2011 the biggest loser in domestic migration, when measured by the rate of net migration per 1,000 residents (-5.68), was Chicago.

The article suggests that demographic and economic conditions may accelerate the domestic movement of individuals away from Chicago and similar cities.

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Google Buzz
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Posterous
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • email

No related posts.

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

Mike December 7, 2012 at 3:43 AM

Corrupt parking deals, red-light cameras, soon to be speed cameras (for the children), higher water bills, high property taxes, increase in the income and corporate tax, massively underfunded pensions, poor schools, increased shooting and murder rate…… can you blame them for leaving?

Reply

aleks December 7, 2012 at 12:16 PM

Add one of the highest sales tax rates in the country, traffic jams everywhere, and public transportation system that does not serve half the city.

Reply

Ben L December 7, 2012 at 12:47 PM

Drawing conclusions about individual cities from statistics about metropolitan areas is a hallmark of the poor scholarship Cox and Kotkin regularly produce

Reply

the urban politician December 7, 2012 at 2:03 PM

From 1600-1930, tens of millions of immigrants moved from Europe to the US. Yet Europe is still doing fine.

There is and always be a “promised” land, especially for those who come from an area in which opportunities have become saturated.

I guess this is how society equilabrates. I really don’t think Chicago, LA, NY, or SF have anything to worry about, at least in the long term.

Reply

Mike December 8, 2012 at 9:11 AM

“Yet Europe is still doing fine.”

I bet the Greeks, Spaniards, Portuguese, Italians, and Irish would disagree with you. The French will join them quickly.

Reply

the urban politician December 8, 2012 at 9:09 PM

Mike, you and I know Europe’s problems today, in 2012, have practically nothing to do with the migration of Europeans to the Americas centuries ago.

I fact, a strong American economy would actually benefit them.

Reply

PosterBoy December 9, 2012 at 5:29 PM
pedro December 11, 2012 at 12:54 PM

Whose worse Aaron Renn or Cox/Kotkin?

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous Post:

Next Post: