Lincoln Square marker

In case you were wondering, you just entered LINCOLN SQUARE! Obnoxious markers like the one above have popped up in various neighborhoods in recent years, marking more than anything else, steady progress down the path to Disneyfication in Chicago.

They’re usually silly from a design standpoint. Everything from the choice of a font to the pillars reminiscent of vintage lampposts in this one conveys a sort of old timey, aw-shucks, Hometown USA vision that apart from being aesthetically poor, feels completely false in a great urban center.

But these markers are a bad idea on another level too. The very notion of clearly delineating neighborhoods in this way runs counter to the fluidity and dynamism on which urban neighborhoods thrive. Is it easier to market Lincoln Square and draw customers with this sort of identification? That’s part of the reasoning behind The Lakota Group’s strategic plan for the area, but Lincoln Square was thriving without the green arches, which are posted at Leland and Lincoln and a block north, at Lawrence and Lincoln.

Much of the growth in Lincoln Square has been south of Leland, and residents think of blocks of Lincoln as far south as Montrose as part of Lincoln Square. The idea of what constitutes the square has spread out as the commercial district has grown in the organic way that retail strips do in big cities. Why cordone off one block of Lincoln with this official label?

Sure, the signs draw attention, but they do it in a fairly gaudy way and in one that detracts from the natural charm of some beautiful vintage buildings (actual vintage, not faux like the markers). The banners that so many neighborhood groups hang from lampposts are much less obtrusive and much less expensive. They’re also a much easier way to highlight cohesion and identity and can expand or contract in an area over time.

The permanent markers favored by the city and The Lakota Group look dated the day they’re installed, and unless we want to resurrect Riverview, we’re better off without them.

Riverview amusement park

Comments ( 6 )

  • In general, I like markers such as the Lincoln Square gates. I also like the Puerto Rican flags on Division and the markers in Old Town.

    They’re not always so well designed (such as the pylons in Boystown) but I think they really give a sense of place for folks living in those neighborhoods. They aslo help to identify the central core of the neighborhood for visitors (I don’t think they’re meant to define the neigborhood’s boundries).

    As for how they look, they’re always “designed by committee” and become watered-down versions of something that was possibly quite good.

  • I think neighborhoods should be delineated the same way CTA lines are – by color.

    Pave the sidewalks in a different color concrete for contiguous neighborhoods so we can know where we are without having to look around.

  • Ouch! You guys are harsh! Hey, I like the darn things. I love the rainbow markers in Boystown, I never thought twice about the archway over that small stretch of Lincoln Ave. in Lincoln Square, and I have always thought the huge flag over Division Street in Humbolt Park was quite brave for its time.

  • What do you expect from a part of the city that prides itself on its sterile and cookie cutter image?

  • People who put down Lincoln Square are only jealous because they wish they lived there. I love the monuments! I think they should have spaced every 20ft on center.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *